Agencies serving EU clients
When you run QA for EU clients, you need to understand where test data goes and which vendors can access it. EU-hosted product processing can reduce cross-border transfer complexity.
AI testing can expose site content, screenshots, and user-journey data to the testing vendor. When that processing uses US infrastructure or external AI providers, European teams must assess the transfer and its safeguards.
Mira reduces that transfer surface: product-data processing stays in the EU, with AI running on our own EU infrastructure.
A testing tool touches real pages, forms, and sometimes personal data. EU hosting helps, but it does not establish compliance on its own. A vendor review should cover:
Know where product data is processed and which safeguards apply to any third-country transfer.
Confirm whether site content, screenshots, and test data can feed model-training pipelines.
Identify every AI provider that can receive product data and the terms governing that processing.
Review the vendor's processing terms, security measures, and responsibilities before approval.
Limit collection to what the tests need and establish how long each data category is retained.
Mira reduces the transfer surface for website testing by keeping product-data processing and AI execution on its own EU infrastructure. These product-design choices support a GDPR review; your organisation remains responsible for assessing its own use case and obligations.
Your data is processed on our own servers in the EU and never leaves our infrastructure.
Product-data location and AI processing were considered in the architecture instead of added as an afterthought.
Your site content and test data are never used to train AI models. Not yours, not anyone else's.
Mira runs AI on its own hardware in the EU. Your data never leaves our infrastructure and is never used for training.
Review the published handling of personal information, transfers, safeguards, and retention periods in our Privacy Policy.
Data residency and contractual safeguards are separate questions. This comparison reports what each vendor publishes; it is not a legal-compliance rating.
On narrow screens, scroll the table horizontally to compare transfer terms.
| Vendor | Published product-data location | Published transfer / DPA position |
|---|---|---|
| Mira Checks | Product data and AI processing on Mira-operated infrastructure in the EU | Privacy Policy describes published handling of personal information, transfers, safeguards, and retention periods |
| mabl | All customer data stored in the United States | Works with customers to review and sign a DPA |
| testRigor | Primary processing facilities in the United States | Publishes a DPA with EU Standard Contractual Clauses |
Checked 25 August 2026. Sources: mabl data security and privacy and testRigor Data Processing Addendum. For feature differences, see Mira vs mabl and Mira vs testRigor.
For some teams, EU/GDPR compliance in the QA stack is the first question in every vendor evaluation. Not an afterthought.
When you run QA for EU clients, you need to understand where test data goes and which vendors can access it. EU-hosted product processing can reduce cross-border transfer complexity.
Procurement and privacy teams need clear answers about processing locations, providers, safeguards, and retention. Use the published information as a starting point for your own review.
Finance, healthcare, and public-sector teams often face additional contractual, security, or regulatory requirements. Their review must cover the specific data and workflow being tested.
Mira is live with self-service onboarding. Also see how Mira compares to other AI website testing tools and GDPR-compliant website monitoring for ongoing checks.
Try Mira